Centrosome amplification and aneuploidy driven by the HIV-1-induced Vpr•VprBP•Plk4 complex in CD4+ T cells.

HIV-1 infection elevates the risk of developing various cancers, including T-cell lymphoma. Whether HIV-1-encoded proteins directly contribute to oncogenesis remains unknown. We observe that approximately 1-5% of CD4+ T cells from the blood of people living with HIV-1 exhibit over-duplicated centrioles, suggesting that centrosome amplification underlies the development of HIV-1-associated cancers by driving aneuploidy. Through affinity purification, biochemical, and cellular analyses, we discover that Vpr, an accessory protein of HIV-1, hijacks the centriole duplication machinery and induces centrosome amplification and aneuploidy. Mechanistically, Vpr forms a cooperative ternary complex with an E3 ligase subunit, VprBP, and polo-like kinase 4 (Plk4). Unexpectedly, however, the complex enhances Plk4's functionality by promoting its relocalization to the procentriole assembly and induces centrosome amplification. Loss of either Vpr's C-terminal 17 residues or VprBP acidic region, the two elements required for binding to Plk4 cryptic polo-box, abrogates Vpr's capacity to induce these events. Furthermore, HIV-1 WT, but not its Vpr mutant, induces multiple centrosomes and aneuploidy in human primary CD4+ T cells. We propose that the Vpr•VprBP•Plk4 complex serves as a molecular link that connects HIV-1 infection to oncogenesis and that inhibiting the Vpr C-terminal motif may reduce the occurrence of HIV-1-associated cancers.

Transcriptional regulation of the HIV-1 inhibitory factor human mannose receptor 1 by the myeloid-specific transcription factor PU.1.

HIV-1 infection of human macrophages leads to the downmodulation of human mannose receptor 1 (hMRC1), a cell-surface glycoprotein that is involved in the host innate immune response. We previously reported that downmodulation of hMRC1 involves the transactivator of transcription (Tat)-dependent transcriptional silencing of the hMRC1 promoter. However, the inhibitory effect of Tat on hMRC1 transcription was indirect and involved inhibition of the transcriptional activator PU.1, which normally upregulates hMRC1 expression in macrophages and other myeloid cells. We cloned a 284-bp fragment of the hMRC1 promoter, and within it, we identified four PU.1 box elements. We assessed the relative contribution of each of the four PU.1 boxes to PU.1-dependent transcriptional regulation and, surprisingly, found that only one of the four PU.1 boxes [PU.1(b)] was critically required for PU.1-mediated upregulation of luciferase expression. Transfer of this PU.1 box to a heterologous promoter conferred PU.1 responsiveness to an otherwise PU.1 insensitive promoter. Electrophoretic mobility shift assays identified this PU.1 box as a direct binding site for PU.1 both in the context of the hMRC1 promoter and the heterologous promoter. Furthermore, mutational analysis of the PU.1 protein identified the C-terminal DNA-binding domain in PU.1 as the region responsible for interaction with the PU.1 box. Recombinant HIV-1 Tat protein did not bind to the hMRC1 promoter element but efficiently interfered with the binding of PU.1 protein to the hMRC1 promoter. Thus, Tat is likely to inhibit the formation of active PU.1 transcription complexes, presumably by binding to and depleting common transcriptional cofactors.IMPORTANCEHIV-1 infection of cells results in the modulation of cellular gene expression by virus-encoded proteins in a manner that benefits the virus. We reported that HIV-1 transactivator of transcription (Tat) dysregulates the expression of the human mannose receptor 1 (hMRC1). hMRC1 is involved in the innate immune response of macrophages to foreign pathogens. Tat does not act directly on the hMRC1 promoter but instead inhibits PU.1, a cellular transcription factor regulating hMRC1 gene expression. Here, we characterize the PU.1-dependent regulation of hMRC1 expression. We identified four potential PU.1 binding sites in the hMRC1 promoter region but found that only one, PU.1(b), functioned as a true binding site for PU.1. Transfer of the PU.1(b) box to a heterologous promoter did not activate this promoter per se but rendered it responsive to PU.1. Our results support the view that PU.1 acts as a transcriptional co-factor whose activity can be regulated by HIV-1 Tat.

Macrophage-Derived Factors with the Potential to Contribute to Pathogenicity of HIV-1 and HIV-2: Role of CCL-2/MCP-1.

Human immunodeficiency virus type 2 (HIV-2) is known to be less pathogenic than HIV-1. However, the mechanism(s) underlying the decreased HIV-2 pathogenicity is not fully understood. Herein, we report that ß-chemokine CCL2 expression was increased in HIV-1-infected human monocyte-derived macrophages (MDM) but decreased in HIV-2-infected MDM when compared to uninfected MDM. Inhibition of CCL2 expression following HIV-2 infection occurred at both protein and mRNA levels. By microarray analysis, quantitative PCR, and Western blotting, we identified that Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription 1 (STAT1), a critical transcription factor for inducing CCL2 gene expression, was also reduced in HIV-2-infected MDM. Blockade of STAT1 in HIV-infected MDM using a STAT1 inhibitor significantly reduced the production of CCL2. In contrast, transduction of STAT1-expressing pseudo-retrovirus restored CCL2 production in HIV-2-infected MDM. These findings support the concept that CCL2 inhibition in HIV-2-infected MDM is meditated by reduction of STAT1. Furthermore, we showed that STAT1 reduction in HIV-2-infected MDM was regulated by the CUL2/RBX1 ubiquitin E3 ligase complex-dependent proteasome pathway. Knockdown of CUL2 or RBX1 restored the expression of STAT1 and CCL2 in HIV-2-infected MDM. Taken together, our findings suggest that differential regulation of the STAT1-CCL2 axis may be one of the mechanisms underlying the different pathogenicity observed for HIV-1 and HIV-2.

Human Mannose Receptor 1 Attenuates HIV-1 Infectivity in a Virus Isolate-Specific Manner.

Human mannose receptor 1 (hMRC1) is a transmembrane glycoprotein that belongs to the C-type lectin family and is expressed on the surface of most tissue macrophages. hMRC1 contributes to the binding and transmission of HIV-1 and is involved in the endocytic uptake of HIV-1 for subsequent antigen presentation. We previously reported that hMRC1 functions as an antiviral factor by inhibiting virus release through a BST-2-like mechanism. The inhibition of virus release was not virus isolate-specific and, surprisingly, was not Env-dependent. We now report on another hMRC1 antiviral function that affects the infectivity of viral particles. Unlike its effect on virus release, the inhibition of viral infectivity by hMRC1 was virus isolate-specific. An analysis of chimeric Env revealed that the Env V3 region was a critical determinant for the inhibitory effect of hMRC1. Of note, exogenously expressed hMRC1 was packaged into viral particles in an Env-independent manner. Co-immunoprecipitation studies revealed a strong interaction of the hMRC1-sensitive NL43 Env with hMRC1, while the hMRC1-insensitive Envs of AD8 and 49.5 isolates interacted poorly if at all with hMRC1. An analysis of a panel of Transmitted/Founder (T/F) viruses revealed that all of them were R5-tropic, and more than half of them were inhibited by hMRC1. The detailed mechanism of how hMRC1 inhibits viral infectivity remains to be investigated. However, the high-affinity binding of hMRC1 to Env may cause a conformational change around the Env V3 region or obstruct the Env V3 region and may make it inaccessible for subsequent interaction with the coreceptor during virus entry.

Centrosome amplification and aneuploidy driven by the HIV-1-induced Vpr•VprBP•Plk4 complex in CD4+ T cells.

HIV-1 infection elevates the risk of developing various cancers, including T-cell lymphoma. Whether HIV-1-encoded proteins directly contribute to oncogenesis remains unknown. We observed that approximately 1-5% of CD4+ T cells from the blood of people living with HIV-1 exhibit over-duplicated centrioles, suggesting that centrosome amplification underlies the development of HIV-1-associated cancers by driving aneuploidy. Through affinity purification, biochemical, and cell biology analyses, we discovered that Vpr, an accessory protein of HIV-1, hijacks the centriole duplication machinery and induces centrosome amplification and aneuploidy. Mechanistically, Vpr formed a cooperative ternary complex with an E3 ligase subunit, VprBP, and polo-like kinase 4 (Plk4). Unexpectedly, however, the complex enhanced Plk4's functionality by promoting its relocalization to the procentriole assembly and induced centrosome amplification. Loss of either Vpr's C-terminal 17 residues or VprBP acidic region, the two elements required for binding to Plk4 cryptic polo-box, abrogated Vpr's capacity to induce all these events. Furthermore, HIV-1 WT, but not its Vpr mutant, induced multiple centrosomes and aneuploidy in primary CD4+ T cells. We propose that the Vpr•VprBP•Plk4 complex serves as a molecular link that connects HIV-1 infection to oncogenesis and that inhibiting the Vpr C-terminal motif may reduce the occurrence of HIV-1-associated cancers.

HIV-1 Vpr Induces Degradation of Gelsolin, a Myeloid Cell-Specific Host Factor That Reduces Viral Infectivity by Inhibiting the Expression and Packaging of the HIV-1 Env Glycoprotein.

Gelsolin (GSN) is a structural actin-binding protein that is known to affect actin dynamics in the cell. Using mass spectrometry, we identified GSN as a novel Vpr-interacting protein. Endogenous GSN protein was expressed at detectable levels in monocyte-derived macrophages (MDM) and in THP-1 cells, but it was undetectable at the protein level in other cell lines tested. The HIV-1 infection of MDM was associated with a reduction in GSN steady-state levels, presumably due to the Vpr-induced degradation of GSN. Indeed, the coexpression of GSN and Viral protein R (Vpr) in transiently transfected HEK293T cells resulted in the Vpr-dependent proteasomal degradation of GSN. This effect was observed for Vprs from multiple virus isolates. The overexpression of GSN in HEK293T cells had no effect on Gag expression or particle release, but it reduced the expression and packaging of the HIV-1 envelope (Env) glycoprotein and reduced viral infectivity. An analysis of the HIV-1 splicing patterns did not reveal any GSN-dependent differences, suggesting that the effect of GSN on Env expression was regulated at a posttranscriptional level. Indeed, the treatment of transfected cells with lysosomal inhibitors reversed the effect of GSN on Env stability, suggesting that GSN reduced Env expression via enhanced lysosomal degradation. Our data identify GSN as a macrophage-specific host antiviral factor that reduces the expression of HIV-1 Env. IMPORTANCE Despite dramatic progress in drug therapies, HIV-1 infection remains an incurable disease that affects millions of people worldwide. The virus establishes long-lasting reservoirs that are resistant to currently available drug treatments and allow the virus to rebound whenever drug therapy is interrupted. Macrophages are long-lived cells that are relatively insensitive to HIV-1-induced cytopathicity and thus could contribute to the viral reservoir. Here, we identified a novel host factor, gelsolin, that is expressed at high levels in macrophages and inhibits viral infectivity by modulating the expression of the HIV-1 Env glycoprotein, which is critical in the spread of an HIV-1 infection. Importantly, the viral protein Vpr induces the degradation of gelsolin and thus counteracts its antiviral activity. Our study provides significant and novel insights into HIV-1 virus-host interactions and furthers our understanding of the importance of Vpr in HIV-1 infection and pathogenesis.

The Myeloid-Specific Transcription Factor PU.1 Upregulates Mannose Receptor Expression but Represses Basal Activity of the HIV-LTR Promoter.

Human mannose receptor 1 (MRC1) is a cell surface receptor expressed in macrophages and other myeloid cells that inhibits human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) particle release by tethering virions to producer cell membranes. HIV-1 counteracts MRC1 expression by inhibiting mrc1 transcription. Here, we investigated the mechanism of MRC1 downregulation in HIV-1-infected macrophages. We identified the myeloid cell-specific transcription factor PU.1 as critical for regulating MRC1 expression. In the course of our study, we recognized a complex interplay between HIV-1 Tat and PU.1 transcription factors: Tat upregulated HIV-1 gene expression but inhibited mrc1 transcription, whereas PU.1 inhibited HIV-1 transcription but activated MRC1 expression. Disturbing this equilibrium by silencing PU.1 resulted in increased HIV-1 gene expression and reduced MRC1 promoter activity. Our study identified PU.1 as a central player in transcriptional control, regulating a complex interplay between viral and host gene expression in HIV-infected macrophages. IMPORTANCE HIV-1 replication in primary human cells depends on the activity of virus-encoded proteins but also involves cellular factors that can either promote (viral dependency factors) or inhibit (host restriction factors) virus replication. In previous work, we identified human MRC1 as a macrophage-specific host restriction factor that inhibits the detachment of viral particles from infected cells. Here, we report that HIV-1 counteracts this effect of MRC1 by imposing a transcriptional block on cellular MRC1 gene expression. The transcriptional inhibition of the MRC1 gene is accomplished by Tat, an HIV-1 factor whose best-described function actually is the enhancement of HIV-1 gene expression. Thus, HIV-1 has evolved to use the same protein for (i) activation of its own gene expression while (ii) inhibiting expression of MRC1 and other host factors.

Simian Immunodeficiency Virus SIVgsn-99CM71 Vpu Employs Different Amino Acids To Antagonize Human and Greater Spot-Nosed Monkey BST-2.

Viral protein U (Vpu) is an accessory protein encoded by human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) and certain simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) strains. Some of these viruses were reported to use Vpu to overcome restriction by BST-2 of their natural hosts. Our own recent report revealed that Vpu of SIVgsn-99CM71 (SIVgsn71) antagonizes human BST-2 through two AxxxxxxxW motifs (A22W30 and A25W33), whereas antagonizing BST-2 of its natural host, greater spot-nosed monkey (GSN), involved only the A22W30 motif. Here, we show that residues A22, A25, W30, and W33 of SIVgsn71 Vpu are all essential to antagonize human BST-2, whereas a single mutation of either A22 or W30 did not affect the ability to antagonize GSN BST-2. Similar to A18, which is located in the middle of the A14xxxxxxxW22 motif in HIV-1 NL4-3 Vpu and is essential to antagonize human BST-2, A29, located in the middle of the A25W33 motif of SIVgsn71 Vpu was found to be necessary for antagonizing human but not GSN BST-2. Further mutational analyses revealed that residues L21 and K32 of SIVgsn71 Vpu were also essential for antagonizing human BST-2. On the other hand, the ability of SIVgsn71 Vpu to target GSN BST-2 was unaffected by single amino acid substitutions but required multiple mutations to render SIVgsn71 Vpu inactive against GSN BST-2. These results suggest additional requirements for SIVgsn71 Vpu antagonizing human BST-2, implying evolution of the bst-2 gene under strong selective pressure. IMPORTANCE Genes related to survival against life-threating pathogens are important determinants of natural selection in animal evolution. For instance, BST-2, a protein showing broad-spectrum antiviral activity, shows polymorphisms entailing different phenotypes even among primate species, suggesting that the bst-2 gene of primates has been subject to strong selective pressure during evolution. At the same time, viruses readily adapt to these evolutionary changes. Thus, we found that the Vpu of an SIVgsn isolate (SIVgsn-99CM71) can target BST-2 from humans as well as from its natural host, thus potentially facilitating zoonosis. Here, we mapped residues in SIVgsn71 Vpu potentially contributing to cross-species transmission. We found that the requirements for targeting human BST-2 are distinct from and more complex than those for targeting GSN BST-2. Our results suggest that the human bst-2 gene might have evolved to acquire more restrictive phenotype than GSN bst-2 against viral proteins after being derived from their common ancestor.

APOBEC3B Potently Restricts HIV-2 but Not HIV-1 in a Vif-Dependent Manner.

Vif is a lentiviral accessory protein that counteracts the antiviral activity of cellular APOBEC3 (A3) cytidine deaminases in infected cells. The exact contribution of each member of the A3 family for the restriction of HIV-2 is still unclear. Thus, the aim of this work was to identify the A3s with anti-HIV-2 activity and compare their restriction potential for HIV-2 and HIV-1. We found that A3G is a strong restriction factor of both types of viruses and A3C restricts neither HIV-1 nor HIV-2. Importantly, A3B exhibited potent antiviral activity against HIV-2, but its effect was negligible against HIV-1. Whereas A3B is packaged with similar efficiency into both viruses in the absence of Vif, HIV-2 and HIV-1 differ in their sensitivity to A3B. HIV-2 Vif targets A3B by reducing its cellular levels and inhibiting its packaging into virions, whereas HIV-1 Vif did not evolve to antagonize A3B. Our observations support the hypothesis that during wild-type HIV-1 and HIV-2 infections, both viruses are able to replicate in host cells expressing A3B but using different mechanisms, probably resulting from a Vif functional adaptation over evolutionary time. Our findings provide new insights into the differences between Vif protein and their cellular partners in the two human viruses. Of note, A3B is highly expressed in some cancer cells and may cause deamination-induced mutations in these cancers. Thus, A3B may represent an important therapeutic target. As such, the ability of HIV-2 Vif to induce A3B degradation could be an effective tool for cancer therapy. IMPORTANCE Primate lentiviruses encode a series of accessory genes that facilitate virus adaptation to its host. Among those, the vif-encoded protein functions primarily by targeting the APOBEC3 (A3) family of cytidine deaminases. All lentiviral Vif proteins have the ability to antagonize A3G; however, antagonizing other members of the A3 family is variable. Here, we report that HIV-2 Vif, unlike HIV-1 Vif, can induce degradation of A3B. Consequently, HIV-2 Vif but not HIV-1 Vif can inhibit the packaging of A3B. Interestingly, while A3B is packaged efficiently into the core of both HIV-1 and HIV-2 virions in the absence of Vif, it only affects the infectivity of HIV-2 particles. Thus, HIV-1 and HIV-2 have evolved two distinct mechanisms to antagonize the antiviral activity of A3B. Aside from its antiviral activity, A3B has been associated with mutations in some cancers. Degradation of A3B by HIV-2 Vif may be useful for cancer therapies.

Antiviral Activity and Adaptive Evolution of Avian Tetherins.

Tetherin/BST-2 is an antiviral protein that blocks the release of enveloped viral particles by linking them to the membrane of producing cells. At first, BST-2 genes were described only in humans and other mammals. Recent work identified BST-2 orthologs in nonmammalian vertebrates, including birds. Here, we identify the BST-2 sequence in domestic chicken (Gallus gallus) for the first time and demonstrate its activity against avian sarcoma and leukosis virus (ASLV). We generated a BST-2 knockout in chicken cells and showed that BST-2 is a major determinant of an interferon-induced block of ASLV release. Ectopic expression of chicken BST-2 blocks the release of ASLV in chicken cells and of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) in human cells. Using metabolic labeling and pulse-chase analysis of HIV-1 Gag proteins, we verified that chicken BST-2 blocks the virus at the release stage. Furthermore, we describe BST-2 orthologs in multiple avian species from 12 avian orders. Previously, some of these species were reported to lack BST-2, highlighting the difficulty of identifying sequences of this extremely variable gene. We analyzed BST-2 genes in the avian orders Galliformes and Passeriformes and showed that they evolve under positive selection. This indicates that avian BST-2 is involved in host-virus evolutionary arms races and suggests that BST-2 antagonists exist in some avian viruses. In summary, we show that chicken BST-2 has the potential to act as a restriction factor against ASLV. Characterizing the interaction of avian BST-2 with avian viruses is important in understanding innate antiviral defenses in birds.IMPORTANCE Birds are important hosts of viruses that have the potential to cause zoonotic infections in humans. However, only a few antiviral genes (called viral restriction factors) have been described in birds, mostly because birds lack counterparts of highly studied mammalian restriction factors. Tetherin/BST-2 is a restriction factor, originally described in humans, that blocks the release of newly formed virus particles from infected cells. Recent work identified BST-2 in nonmammalian vertebrate species, including birds. Here, we report the BST-2 sequence in domestic chicken and describe its antiviral activity against a prototypical avian retrovirus, avian sarcoma and leukosis virus (ASLV). We also identify BST-2 genes in multiple avian species and show that they evolve rapidly in birds, which is an important indication of their relevance for antiviral defense. Analysis of avian BST-2 genes will shed light on defense mechanisms against avian viral pathogens.

Inhibition of Vif-Mediated Degradation of APOBEC3G through Competitive Binding of Core-Binding Factor Beta.

Vif counteracts the host restriction factor APOBEC3G (A3G) and other APOBEC3s by preventing the incorporation of A3G into progeny virions. We previously identified Vif mutants with a dominant-negative (D/N) phenotype that interfered with the function of wild-type Vif, inhibited the degradation of A3G, and reduced the infectivity of viral particles by increased packaging of A3G. However, the mechanism of interference remained unclear, in particular since all D/N Vif mutants were unable to bind Cul5 and some mutants additionally failed to bind A3G, ruling out competitive binding to A3G or the E3 ubiquitin ligase complex as the sole mechanism. The goal of the current study was to revisit the mechanism of D/N interference by Vif mutants and analyze the possible involvement of core binding factor beta (CBFß) in this process. We found a clear correlation of D/N properties of Vif mutants with their ability to engage CBFß. Only mutants that retained the ability to bind CBFß exhibited the D/N phenotype. Competition studies revealed that D/N Vif mutants directly interfered with the association of CBFß and wild-type Vif. Furthermore, overexpression of CBFß counteracted the interference of D/N Vif mutants with A3G degradation by wild-type Vif. Finally, overexpression of Runx1 mimicked the effect of D/N Vif mutants and inhibited the degradation of A3G by wild-type Vif. Taken together, we identified CBFß as the key player involved in D/N interference by Vif.IMPORTANCE Of all the accessory proteins encoded by HIV-1 and other primate lentiviruses, Vif has arguably the strongest potential as a target for antiviral therapy. This conclusion is based on the observation that replication of HIV-1 in vivo is critically dependent on Vif. Thus, inhibiting the function of Vif via small-molecule inhibitors or other approaches has significant therapeutic potential. We previously identified dominant-negative (D/N) Vif variants whose expression interferes with the function of virus-encoded wild-type Vif. We now show that D/N interference involves competitive binding of D/N Vif variants to the transcriptional cofactor core binding factor beta (CBFß), which is expressed in cells in limiting quantities. Overexpression of CBFß neutralized the D/N phenotype of Vif. In contrast, overexpression of Runx1, a cellular binding partner of CBFß, phenocopied the D/N Vif phenotype by sequestering endogenous CBFß. Thus, our results provide proof of principle that D/N Vif variants could have therapeutic potential.

Vpu of a Simian Immunodeficiency Virus Isolated from Greater Spot-Nosed Monkey Antagonizes Human BST-2 via Two AxxxxxxxW Motifs.

BST-2/CD317/tetherin is a host transmembrane protein that potently inhibits human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) virion release by tethering the nascent virions to the plasma membrane. Viral protein U (Vpu) is an accessory protein encoded by HIV-1 as well as by some simian immunodeficiency viruses (SIVs) infecting wild chimpanzees, gorillas, or monkeys (SIVcpz, SIVgor, or SIVgsn/SIVmon/SIVmus, respectively). HIV-1 Vpu directly binds to and downregulates human BST-2. The antagonism is highly species specific because the amino acid sequences of BST-2 are different among animal species. Here, we show that Vpu proteins from several SIVcpz, SIVgsn, SIVmon, or SIVmus isolates fail to antagonize human BST-2. Only Vpu from an SIVgsn isolate (SIVgsn-99CM71 [SIVgsn71]) was able to antagonize human BST-2 as well as BST-2 of its natural host, greater spot-nosed monkey (GSN). This SIVgsn Vpu interacted with human BST-2, downregulated cell surface human BST-2 expression, and facilitated HIV-1 virion release in the presence of human BST-2. While the unique 14AxxxxxxxW22 motif in the transmembrane domain of HIV-1NL4-3Vpu was reported to be important for antagonizing human BST-2, we show here that two AxxxxxxxW motifs (A22W30 and A25W33) exist in SIVgsn71 Vpu. Only the A22W30 motif was needed for SIVgsn71 Vpu to antagonize GSN BST-2, suggesting that the mechanism of this antagonism resembles that of HIV-1NL4-3 Vpu against human BST-2. Interestingly, SIVgsn71 Vpu requires two AxxxxxxxW (A22W30 and A25W33) motifs to antagonize human BST-2, suggesting an as-yet-undefined way that SIVgsn71 Vpu works against human BST-2. These results imply an evolutionary impact of primate BST-2 on lentiviral Vpu.IMPORTANCE Genetic alterations conferring a selective advantage in protecting from life-threating pathogens are maintained during evolution. In fact, the amino acid sequences of BST-2 differ among primate animals and their susceptibility to viral proteins is species specific, suggesting that such genetic diversity has arisen through the evolutionarily controlled balance between the host and pathogens. The M (main) group of HIV-1 is thought to be derived from SIVcpz, which utilizes Nef, but not Vpu, to antagonize chimpanzee BST-2. SIVcpz Nef is, however, unable to antagonize human BST-2, and Vpu was consequently chosen again as an antagonist against human BST-2 in the context of HIV-1. Studies on how Vpu lost and acquired this ability, together with the distinct mechanisms by which SIVgsn71 Vpu binds to and downregulates human or GSN BST-2, may help to explain the evolution of this lentiviral protein as a result of host-pathogen interactions.

Vpr and Its Cellular Interaction Partners: R We There Yet?

Vpr is a lentiviral accessory protein that is expressed late during the infection cycle and is packaged in significant quantities into virus particles through a specific interaction with the P6 domain of the viral Gag precursor. Characterization of the physiologically relevant function(s) of Vpr has been hampered by the fact that in many cell lines, deletion of Vpr does not significantly affect viral fitness. However, Vpr is critical for virus replication in primary macrophages and for viral pathogenesis in vivo. It is generally accepted that Vpr does not have a specific enzymatic activity but functions as a molecular adapter to modulate viral or cellular processes for the benefit of the virus. Indeed, many Vpr interacting factors have been described by now, and the goal of this review is to summarize our current knowledge of cellular proteins targeted by Vpr.

Cytokine Effects on the Entry of Filovirus Envelope Pseudotyped Virus-Like Particles into Primary Human Macrophages.

Macrophages are one of the first and also a major site of filovirus replication and, in addition, are a source of multiple cytokines, presumed to play a critical role in the pathogenesis of the viral infection. Some of these cytokines are known to induce macrophage phenotypic changes in vitro, but how macrophage polarization may affect the cell susceptibility to filovirus entry remains largely unstudied. We generated different macrophage subsets using cytokine pre-treatment and subsequently tested their ability to fuse with beta-lactamase containing virus-like particles (VLP), pseudotyped with the surface glycoprotein of Ebola virus (EBOV) or the glycoproteins of other clinically relevant filovirus species. We found that pre-incubation of primary human monocyte-derived macrophages (MDM) with interleukin-10 (IL-10) significantly enhanced filovirus entry into cells obtained from multiple healthy donors, and the IL-10 effect was preserved in the presence of pro-inflammatory cytokines found to be elevated during EBOV disease. In contrast, fusion of IL-10-treated macrophages with influenza hemagglutinin/neuraminidase pseudotyped VLPs was unchanged or slightly reduced. Importantly, our in vitro data showing enhanced virus entry are consistent with the correlation established between elevated serum IL-10 and increased mortality in filovirus infected patients and also reveal a novel mechanism that may account for the IL-10-mediated increase in filovirus pathogenicity.

Apolipoprotein E is an HIV-1-inducible inhibitor of viral production and infectivity in macrophages.

Apolipoprotein E (ApoE) belongs to a class of cellular proteins involved in lipid metabolism. ApoE is a polymorphic protein produced primarily in macrophages and astrocytes. Different isoforms of ApoE have been associated with susceptibility to various diseases including Alzheimer's and cardiovascular diseases. ApoE expression has also been found to affect susceptibility to several viral diseases, including Hepatitis C and E, but its effect on the life cycle of HIV-1 remains obscure. In this study, we initially found that HIV-1 infection selectively up-regulated ApoE in human monocyte-derived macrophages (MDMs). Interestingly, ApoE knockdown in MDMs enhanced the production and infectivity of HIV-1, and was associated with increased localization of viral envelope (Env) proteins to the cell surface. Consistent with this, ApoE over-expression in 293T cells suppressed Env expression and viral infectivity, which was also observed with HIV-2 Env, but not with VSV-G Env. Mechanistic studies revealed that the C-terminal region of ApoE was required for its inhibitory effect on HIV-1 Env expression. Moreover, we found that ApoE and Env co-localized in the cells, and ApoE associated with gp160, the precursor form of Env, and that the suppression of Env expression by ApoE was cancelled by the treatment with lysosomal inhibitors. Overall, our study revealed that ApoE is an HIV-1-inducible inhibitor of viral production and infectivity in macrophages that exerts its anti-HIV-1 activity through association with gp160 Env via the C-terminal region, which results in subsequent degradation of gp160 Env in the lysosomes.

HIV-1 Vpr and p21 restrict LINE-1 mobility.

Long interspersed element-1 (LINE-1, L1) composes ∼17% of the human genome. However, genetic interactions between L1 and human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) remain poorly understood. In this study, we found that HIV-1 suppresses L1 retrotransposition. Notably, HIV-1 Vpr strongly inhibited retrotransposition without inhibiting L1 promoter activity. Since Vpr is known to regulate host cell cycle, we examined the possibility whether Vpr suppresses L1 retrotransposition in a cell cycle dependent manner. We showed that the inhibitory effect of a mutant Vpr (H71R), which is unable to arrest the cell cycle, was significantly relieved compared with that of wild-type Vpr, suggesting that Vpr suppresses L1 mobility in a cell cycle dependent manner. Furthermore, a host cell cycle regulator p21Waf1 strongly suppressed L1 retrotransposition. The N-terminal kinase inhibitory domain (KID) of p21 was required for this inhibitory effect. Another KID-containing host cell cycle regulator p27Kip1 also strongly suppressed L1 retrotransposition. We showed that Vpr and p21 coimmunoprecipitated with L1 ORF2p and they suppressed the L1 reverse transcriptase activity in LEAP assay, suggesting that Vpr and p21 inhibit ORF2p-mediated reverse transcription. Altogether, our results suggest that viral and host cell cycle regulatory machinery limit L1 mobility in cultured cells.

Mannose Receptor 1 Restricts HIV Particle Release from Infected Macrophages.

Human mannose receptor 1 (hMRC1) is expressed on the surface of most tissue macrophages, dendritic cells, and select lymphatic or liver endothelial cells. HMRC1 contributes to the binding of HIV-1 to monocyte-derived macrophages (MDMs) and is involved in the endocytic uptake of HIV-1 into these cells. Here, we identify hMRC1 as an antiviral factor that inhibits virus release through a bone marrow stromal antigen 2 (BST-2)-like mechanism. Virions produced in the presence of hMRC1 accumulated in clusters at the cell surface but were fully infectious. HIV-1 counteracted the effect by transcriptional silencing of hMRC1. The effect of hMRC1 was not virus isolate specific. Surprisingly, deletion of the Env protein, which is known to interact with hMRC1, did not relieve the hMRC1 antiviral activity, suggesting the involvement of additional cellular factor(s) in the process. Our data reveal an antiviral mechanism that is active in primary human macrophages and is counteracted by HIV-1 through downregulation of hMRC1.

Pyviko: an automated Python tool to design gene knockouts in complex viruses with overlapping genes.

BACKGROUND: Gene knockouts are a common tool used to study gene function in various organisms. However, designing gene knockouts is complicated in viruses, which frequently contain sequences that code for multiple overlapping genes. Designing mutants that can be traced by the creation of new or elimination of existing restriction sites further compounds the difficulty in experimental design of knockouts of overlapping genes. While software is available to rapidly identify restriction sites in a given nucleotide sequence, no existing software addresses experimental design of mutations involving multiple overlapping amino acid sequences in generating gene knockouts. RESULTS: Pyviko performed well on a test set of over 240,000 gene pairs collected from viral genomes deposited in the National Center for Biotechnology Information Nucleotide database, identifying a point mutation which added a premature stop codon within the first 20 codons of the target gene in 93.2% of all tested gene-overprinted gene pairs. This shows that Pyviko can be used successfully in a wide variety of contexts to facilitate the molecular cloning and study of viral overprinted genes. CONCLUSIONS: Pyviko is an extensible and intuitive Python tool for designing knockouts of overlapping genes. Freely available as both a Python package and a web-based interface ( http://louiejtaylor.github.io/pyViKO/ ), Pyviko simplifies the experimental design of gene knockouts in complex viruses with overlapping genes.